Is Wal-Mart too late to the game?
I’ve written extensively on this blog about the coming disruption in healthcare; however, I’ve also written that legacy companies don’t automatically perish if they fail to disrupt. Instead, their future success lies in their ability to adapt in the face of disruption.
Wal-Mart is poised to do both. It’s adapting to other retailers’, like Walgreens’, disruptive entries into providing healthcare services. And it’s becoming a disruptor in its own right by extending the retail-clinic model and disrupting the business model of traditional healthcare providers.
A Forbes article on Wal-Mart’s primary care foray sums up the biggest reason Wal-Mart is likely to succeed: “Walmart’s corporate strategy has never been about first-mover advantage — it’s about distribution efficiency and cost management,” said Alicia Daugherty, who oversees marketing and planning research at The Advisory Board. “Coming in a little later in the game allows them to capitalize on markets created by others, and learn from others’ mistakes.”
Right now, Wal-Mart’s clinics are planned for rural locations, but with more than 4,200 stores across the U.S., there’s no reason the company wouldn’t expand if the first clinics perform well.
What does this mean for non-retail healthcare providers? Your two options
Certainly, competition for primary care services is about to get much harsher. You have two plays: Either find a way to compete with the Wal-Marts, Walgreens and CVS of the world for primary care, or make sure their providers are referring more complex cases to you.
As Kenneth Kaufman, chair of Kaufman Hall, recently wrote in an article for Becker’s:
“Even speed, strong ideas, and sizable resources do not guarantee success. For Wal-Mart and hospitals alike, innovations will need to yield sizable results to replace revenue likely to be lost due to business-model disruption. Yet, while aggressive efforts at transformation do not ensure success, staying with a legacy business model in a changing environment is an even riskier proposition.”