6 thoughts on the movement from inpatient to outpatient care

Whether Obamacare or Trumpcare, we expect that there will continue to be substantial movement from the inpatient to outpatient arena.

The overall shift to outpatient; big box stores; frogs boiling.

(A) The movement to outpatient care has been gradual but significant. It has been generally at a clip of 2 to 3 percent a year. This movement from hospital inpatient to outpatient varies significantly. Some states have seen very little movement while others have seen substantial movement. This movement is expected to continue for several more years.

(B) Like in big box stores, the movement from inpatient is gradual but significant. Big box stores saw gradual movement to e-commerce that didn't immediately kill their margins and business. However, hospitals, like big box stores, have low profit margins and the gradual loss of inpatient to outpatient business ultimately has a very dramatic impact. Thus, even though gradual, at some point, it creeps up on margins and profits and can be very significant. See the article I co-authored with Molly Gamble titled "Do Hospitals and Health Systems Face the Same Fate as Big Box Stores? 3 Key Thoughts" January 18, 2017 on this issue. For a copy of the article, please email Kirsten Doell at kdoell@mcguirewoods.com.

(C) As an analogy there is the old story about a frog. If you throw a frog into a pot of boiling water it will jump out instantly. But if you place a frog in cold water and slowly raise it to a boil, the frog doesn't know it is in trouble until it is too late  With big box stores we think this was largely the case with the movement to the internet. With hospitals and health systems, the movement started with small movements and then has accelerated to cause greater trouble.

1. Stalls and Hiccups. There are some huge hiccups in the movement to outpatient. There is currently a false claims case investigation with a stand-alone ER company and a large investigation and destruction of value of Theranos, the outpatient lab company. These two areas were expected to have a negative impact on hospitals. They have not been as bad as expected.

2. SCA; Optum. In contrast to the hiccups, there was the recently announced merger of Optum, a health services company that is part of UnitedHealth Group, and Surgical Care Affiliates, an ASC company. This deal brings together in large part the largest payor in the country with one of the largest surgery center providers. I have two or three comments on this. First, SCA has brilliant leadership and we shouldn't underestimate the impact of this move. Second, the fact that Optum, which is part of UnitedHealth Group, is willing to acquire the largest surgery center chain shows how far they have come in no longer being held hostage by local hospitals and health systems. In the old days, even though payors wanted to work with outpatient providers, they were very concerned because of the response their biggest supplier (hospitals) could have on their bottom line. Now, they seem to be willing to make a move.

Other troubling considerations. Here are five thoughts on trouble ahead.

1. Hospitals are seeing lower inpatient days and lower procedures.

2. At the same time they are seeing higher labor costs and the labor costs are hard to reduce.

3. Hospitals can't reduce capacity easily.

4. The impact of the movement and other issues are again leading to layoffs.

5. Supply chain costs are often harder to manage in the outpatient setting.

Answers. In terms of answers to these challenges, here are three thoughts.

1. First, in the ideal situation a hospital can backfill in the capacity it has lost to outpatient.   

2. Second, more sites, whether as a large health system or large big box store, seems to not be the winning strategy. Expansion has the appearance for a period of time of giving the hospital lots of market reach. However, we have found with large health systems that more facilities does not equal more profit or necessarily market essentialism.  

3. Third, there is great opportunity is to be market dominant and market essential. At the same time this has to be done on a rational cost market platform. This seems to be the goal and the place for profitability for health and hospital systems. I.e., one must aim for dominance of market to be needed.

ASCs; urgent care; spine; telemedicine. Certain other examples of the movement to outpatient include:

Surgery Centers. There has been a movement of about 2,000 to 5,500 surgery centers over the last fifteen years. At the same time over the last couple years the net growth in surgery centers has been next to zero.

Urgent Care. On the urgent care side there has been a movement of 3,000 urgent care facilities to about 10,000 sites in a few years. This has been dramatic.

Spine. On the spine side there has been a movement of about 45,000 procedures that are done outpatient to about 300,000 done in the outpatient setting per year.

Telemedicine. Finally, telemedicine has also grown tremendously. This has been rumored to be almost approximately 50 percent of all Oakland, Calif.-based Kaiser Permanente's visits. The fascinating thing about Kaiser and the movement to the efficiency of telemedicine is that because Kaiser is also a major payer, they are responsible for total costs of the care they provide. Subsequently, they need to find ways to deliver care that is cheaper and more efficient. Thus, the great adoption of telemedicine.

More articles on leadership:
80M and counting: Why care what millennials want?
Creating health system strategy when 'policy is out of our control' — 5 questions on ACA repeal with Intermountain CEO Dr. A. Marc Harrison
Easton Hospital names employee of the year: 4 things to know

 

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2019. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.

 

Top 40 Articles from the Past 6 Months