Observational studies more often show correlation, rather than causation, while randomized control trials are more likely to show causation, rather than correlation. Newspaper outlets, however, often treat evidence showing correlation as if it presents causation, according to the article.
Sign up for our FREE E-Weekly for more coverage like this sent to your inbox!
Another feature of scientific coverage in the media is the tendency to select articles outside of journals with the highest impacts in their respective fields, inadvertently choosing studies with weaker quality and experimental design, on average.
The researchers concluded better understanding of how the media covers science may lead to changes in coverage beneficial to the public and public health.
More Articles on Quality:
Study: Half of Geriatric Patients Need Help Making Major Decisions
Study: Hot Water Unnecessary for Handwashing
Top 10 Patient Safety Tools Jan. 20-24
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
