Lawyers want $184M slice of Sutter antitrust settlement

The California Attorney General’s Office and five law firms that sued Sacramento, Calif.-based Sutter Health alleging antitrust violations are seeking 32 percent, or $184 million, of the $575 million settlement that would end the litigation, according to Bloomberg Law. 

Advertisement

The fees cover the nearly 217,000 hours the law firms spent representing the self-funded plans in the class-action lawsuit, the state attorneys and the United Food & Commercial Workers & Employers Benefit Trust. The 32 percent fee falls within the prevailing range of 25 percent to 40 percent in similar cases, according to the report. 

“Together, we conducted ourselves as a single virtual law firm, efficiently combining the many talents of the various legal professionals that were necessary to successfully represent UEBT and overcome what would soon become a scorched-earth defense by Sutter and the five highly skilled law firms and scores of lawyers that represented it in this litigation,” wrote Richard Grossman, Pillsbury & Coleman partner and co-lead counsel in a fee petition, according to Bloomberg Law. 

The law firms filed the petition ahead of final approval of the proposed all-cash settlement. The hearing is slated for July 21 in California Superior Court.  

More articles on legal and regulatory issues:
Physician group under federal investigation tries to claw back emails
UnitedHealthcare squeezes competition like a ‘boa constrictor,’ physicians say
New Florida law gives hospitals a shield in COVID-19 suits

Becker’s 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit is the top tier event that the people leading the future of pharmacy convene. This 3-day event is built specifically for Chief Pharmacy Officers and senior pharmacy leaders. The sessions examine the workforce, financial and clinical priorities shaping pharmacy today. Becker’s is where candid discussions flourish and new ideas thrive. Becker's 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit

Advertisement

Next Up in Legal & Regulatory Issues

Advertisement

Comments are closed.