Why don’t more physicians seek value-based pay arrangements?

Value-based reimbursement programs with quality of care and cost-reduction targets can result in benefits both for payers, providers and for the nation as a whole, according to FTI Consulting, but it hasn’t been easy to get payers and physicians on board.

Advertisement

An FTI Consulting payer-provider survey conducted in April and June found 41 percent of physicians not currently in a value-based relationship say their biggest obstacle to entering into one is their distrust of payers.

Additional findings from the FTI survey include:

  • Of the payers surveyed, 80 percent said value-based arrangements incentivized by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are “very important” to their strategic objectives.
  • Of the physicians surveyed, 92 percent said value-based arrangements are either “somewhat important” or “very important.”
  • Traditional fee-for-service contracts still dominate the healthcare industry. More than half (55 percent) of payers say many of their commercial contracts remain fee-for-service, and only 10 percent report that they no longer have any fee-for-service arrangements.
  • Fifteen percent of polled physicians say they are “only interested” in the fee-for-service reimbursement model.
  • Nearly four-fifths of payers currently are building accountable care organization-type arrangements in which payers and physicians share in the savings they achieve for the Medicare program.
  • Payers believe that only 5 percent of providers are willing to accept the downside risks necessary for value-based models to work.
  • In reality, 16 percent of physicians say they are willing to accept risk, and almost half (49 percent) are mostly interested in upside risk-sharing models.
  • Half of physicians report that their organization has implemented new technology or software to support population health management and value-based reimbursement, 32 percent have not and 18 percent either don’t know or are unsure.
  • Eighty-four percent of payers report they are implementing healthcare IT and population health management tools to meet quality and cost-reduction targets in value-based arrangements. Some tools include EHR platforms, portals for physicians and patients, analytics and customer relationship management tools.
  • About one-third (34 percent) of physicians say that are “not very often” approached by payers for value-based arrangements.
  • FTI Consulting interviewed 20 U.S. payers and surveyed 251 physicians specializing in general practice, internal medicine and family medicine.

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Download Whitepaper

The cost-saving opportunity most health systems overlook

Many hospitals and health systems scrutinize staffing, service lines, and payer contracts for savings. Fewer look at one of their largest assets: real estate.…

Advertisement

Next Up in Financial Management

Advertisement

Comments are closed.