Health systems’ eligibility requirements — intended to determine which patients can safely receive at-home care — may favor certain patients, such as those with access to the internet, according to Dr. Knighton, an associate professor of nursing at Cleveland-based Case Western Reserve University.
In addition, all home environments deemed suitable for hospital-at-home are not necessarily equal, she added. Some patients may live in food deserts without access to nutritious meals to aid in their recovery. Others may live in unhygienic conditions that put them at risk for infections or other health issues, Dr. Knighton wrote.
She recommended hospitals offer hospital-at-home patients technology and meal services, among other actions, to address these equity concerns. The federal government and insurers should also subsidize internet and energy costs for hospital-at-home technology, she argued.
“The potential benefits of hospital-at-home are clear, but only if it can be implemented in a fair and equitable manner,” she wrote. “This will necessitate filling at-home resource and education gaps, and conducting research to determine cost-effectiveness and outcomes.”
Read the full op-ed here.
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.