ICD-10 codes for COVID-19 symptoms inaccurate, study finds

Symptom-specific ICD-10 codes lack sensitivity and fail to accurately capture many patients with relevant COVID-19 symptoms, a study published Aug. 17 in JAMA Network Open found. 

Advertisement

For the cohort study, researchers reviewed EMR records of 2,201 patients who were tested for COVID-19 between March 10 and April 6 at University of Utah Health in Salt Lake City. The study authors sought to find whether the ICD-10 codes accurately captured symptoms of fever, cough and dyspnea among patients being tested for COVID-19. 

Researchers found that the sensitivity, the ability to identify those with a condition, of ICD-10 codes for fever was 26 percent. Specificity, the ability to identify those without a condition, for fever was 98 percent. And the positive predictive value, or likelihood that those who test positive for a disease actually have it, was 96 percent. The negative predictive value, or the likelihood that those who test negative don’t have the disease, was 41 percent. 

Typically, the higher the percentage of the test, the more reliable it is. 

For cough, sensitivity was 44 percent, specificity was 88 percent, the positive predictive value was 96 percent and negative predictive value was 18 percent. For shortness of breath, or dyspnea, sensitivity was 24 percent, specificity was 97 percent, positive predictive value was 93 percent and negative predictive value was 42 percent. 

Because many data models and other aggregation tools rely heavily on ICD-10 codes to find clinical concepts and patterns, “inaccuracy has implications for any downstream scientific discovery or surveillance,” the study authors wrote. 

“Our findings highlight the importance of quality control in COVID-19 data aggregation, which has become increasingly important with recent high-profile journal retractions,” study authors wrote. “As with many aspects of this pandemic, we must pay careful attention to socioeconomically vulnerable populations, including racial minorities, rural patients and low-income patients, for whom the gap between ICD-10 coding and clinical reality could be greater.”

Read the full study here

More articles on healthcare finance:
West Virginia health system gets bankruptcy plan approved; has -120 days cash on hand in Q2
Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta extends furloughs until November
ProMedica posts $234.7M profit

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Financial Management

  • Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital established an affiliation more than 70 years ago in the Texas Medical…

  • Fitch revised Ontario, Calif.-based Prime Healthcare Services’ outlook to positive and affirms its “B” rating.  The revised outlook reflects Fitch’s…

  • Brentwood, Tenn.-based Lifepoint Health, a health system owned by private equity firm Apollo Global Management, has largely grown over the…

Advertisement

Comments are closed.