Will public exchanges capture greater enrollees not eligible for subsidies this open enrollment season (OE 2016)

Listen
Text
  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large

The next open enrollment will be a split bag. The uninsured is comprised of about 51% that are under 138% FPL, 35% between 139-400% FPL leaving the remaining 14% greater than 400% of the FPL, according to Kaiser's survey of low-income Americans and the ACA. That's not the whole story.

Fifty-one percent have not signed up. Why would someone not sign up for health insurance? Of course it's makes good sense to have healthcare protection, not to mention the legal penalties, resulting from not carrying it. There is only one main reason, they truly can't afford it.

The McKinsey Consumer Health Insights survey, supports this with February 2014 data. McKinsey determined the top five reasons for not enrolling as 1. Affordability (52%) 2. Technical challenges (27%), 3. Plan selection (14%) 4. Plan comprehension (8%) and 5. Still deciding (21%). This information is also supported by increased rates filed by the carriers. CareFirst asked for a 30 percent increase for 2015, but was granted only 16 percent in Maryland. However, Baltimore, Maryland actually was tame, eventually averaging a 4.6% increase from the previous year for the 2016 open enrollment (OE). Other states were less fortunate in regard to rate changes from the previous year for example Portland, Oregon at 16.2%, Albuquerque, New Mexico at 11%, Richmond, Virginia 10.8% and Burlington, VT at 9.2% (Source: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of 2016 insurer rate filings to state regulators).

These rates aren't sustainable for Americas to pay, when family salaries are not even keeping pace with basic inflation. So what is a family to do? Pay for bread or buy health insurance? I think we all know what we'd do – it's an easy decision that defines the 'why' behind the fifty-one percent. What is driving rate hikes? There are a number of reasons and the fact insurers are quickly exiting the market, isn't helping. Kaiser identified 11 states that are losing insurers for 2016 OE including Connecticut (4 leaving), DC (2 leaving), Maine (4 leaving), Maryland (5 leaving), Michigan (12 leaving), New Mexico (5 leaving) New York (16 leaving), Oregon (11 leaving), Washington (11 leaving), Virginia (6 leaving) and Vermont (2 leaving). The insurers attribute two reasons for leaving 1. Unsustainable operating losses and 2. Severe technical challenges working with struggling states. The Federal funding assistance faucet is shut off. Exchanges are going to have to redesign their organizations to more effectively accommodate insurers and take action on their concerns. Otherwise, the insurers will be taking their own action – walking out of the public exchange business.

Peter B. Nichol, Former Head of Information Technology, Access Health CT

The views, opinions and positions expressed within these guest posts are those of the author alone and do not represent those of Becker's Hospital Review/Becker's Healthcare. The accuracy, completeness and validity of any statements made within this article are not guaranteed. We accept no liability for any errors, omissions or representations. The copyright of this content belongs to the author and any liability with regards to infringement of intellectual property rights remains with them.​

Copyright © 2021 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Webinars