While websites like Healthcare Compare, Leapfrog Group and U.S. News’ Best Hospitals provide rankings and assign “grades” to hospitals, their rankings include subjective information and focus on certain aspects of each hospital that do not provide an holistic picture of that hospital’s quality, according to the article.
The article’s author contends data reported on these websites is not information the patient necessarily is interested in seeing or needs to see, and hospital lobbyists are ensuring that controversial statistics and information are kept out of sight. However, the author argues that important, accurate and relevant information needs to be available to healthcare consumers, especially given the high number of reported preventable patient deaths.
Research in the Journal of Patient Safety reported 210,000 detected preventable deaths but estimated preventable deaths that were never reported made the real number closer to 440,000.
More Articles on Quality Data:
Low Number of Quality Measurements in ED Inhibit Quality Improvement
RWJF Releases Tools for Using Data in Local Settings
3 Tips for Communicating Hospital Quality Scores
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.