The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied the hospitals’ motion for en banc, or full court, review Oct. 16.
A three-judge panel for the appeals court ruled in July that cuts to the payment rate for drugs purchased under the 340B program are legal. The judges said that the lower HHS drug reimbursement rate “rests on a reasonable interpretation of the Medicare statute.”
The denied petition for a full court review means the three-judge panel’s decision is upheld. Hospitals can still petition the Supreme Court to hear the case.
In 2018, under its proposed Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System, HHS cut the reimbursement rate for 340B drugs by nearly 30 percent.
The American Hospital Association, Association of American Medical Colleges and America’s Essential Hospitals in December 2018 sued to stop the cuts, arguing that HHS exceeded its federal authority to adjust the payment rates.
More articles on legal and regulatory issues:
Pennsylvania physician pleads guilty to involuntary manslaughter in patient’s death
Missouri hospital worker allegedly sexually assaulted patient after snooping her medical records
4 South Carolina physicians charged in $100M billing fraud case
