Humana’s antitrust claims against ‘97,500%’ Mallinckrodt price hike advance

Antitrust claims filed by Humana against Mallinckrodt over price hikes the pharmaceutical company made on an anti-inflammatory drug can advance, a federal judge said Aug. 14.

Advertisement

In a lawsuit filed in August of last year, Humana accused Mallinckrodt of partaking in “one of the most outrageous price-gouging schemes in the history of American medicine” with its anti-inflammatory drug Acthar Gel. Humana alleged that a vial of Acthar cost $40 in 2001, but its cost grew to $39,000 by 2018, or by 97,500 percent.

When the lawsuit was filed, Mallinckrodt told Becker’s in a statement that it “strongly believes that Humana’s complaint is completely without merit” and “that the complaint should be dismissed in its entirety.”

Federal Judge Dale Fischer of Los Angeles declined to grant Mallinckrodt’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit in its entirety, though granted dismissal of some parts of the suit. According to his Aug. 14 order, Mr. Fischer said Humana’s antitrust claims against Mallinckrodt can advance.

More articles on payers:
Humana director resigns
New Mexico health insurer to shut down
UnitedHealthcare phasing out paper checks this year

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Download Whitepaper

The cost-saving opportunity most health systems overlook

Many hospitals and health systems scrutinize staffing, service lines, and payer contracts for savings. Fewer look at one of their largest assets: real estate.…

Advertisement

Next Up in Legal & Regulatory Issues

Advertisement

Comments are closed.