The aim of both laws is to protect patients’ choices regarding medical care by preventing employers or partners from restricting a physician’s ability to practice medicine at the end of a professional relationship, according to the report.
Rhode Island’s law, which went into effect July 1, prohibits any kind of non-compete language in most physician agreements. No contract can “restrict [a physician’s] right to practice medicine,” according to the report.
The law does not apply to the purchase and sale of physician practices.
Connecticut’s law, which also went into effect July 1, limits the duration of a physician’s non-compete clause to one year and limits the geographical location to which the non-compete is effective to up to 15 miles from the primary site where the physician practices. The new law also renders the non-compete clause unenforceable if the physician’s employment is terminated without cause, according to the report.
More articles on legal and regulatory issues:
Carolinas HealthCare asks court to dismiss antitrust lawsuit
Ex-Birmingham Health Care CFO sentenced in $11M fraud
Fake cruise ship physician sentenced to 3 years in prison
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
