The pharmacist allegedly accessed the health information of a client that had previously dated her husband and shared the information with him, according to the report. The pharmacist allegedly accessed the victim’s Social Security number and prescription files, which the pharmacist’s husband was allegedly planning to use against the victim in a paternity lawsuit.
Though the employed pharmacist committed the action, the company is being handed the lawsuit. Walgreens plans to appeal the ruling, according to the report.
“The pharmacist in this case admitted she was aware of our strict privacy policy and knew she was violating it,” said James Graham, senior manager and corporate media relations spokesperson for Walgreens, in a statement. “We believe it is a misapplication of the law to hold an employer liable for the actions of one employee who knowingly violates company policy.”
The verdict was handed down after Walgreens asked the Indiana Court of Appeals to throw out the initial unanimous 2013 verdict awarding the victim the $1.44 million in damages, according to the report.
Walgreens has paid the penalty, but the money will be held by the court until the case is resolved, according to the report.
More articles on HIPAA:
Teaching the Internet to whisper: The evolution of HIPAA
3 new challenges with HIPAA and data security
HIPAA and Ebola: What information should be quarantined?
Becker’s 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit is the top tier event that the people leading the future of pharmacy convene. This 3-day event is built specifically for Chief Pharmacy Officers and senior pharmacy leaders. The sessions examine the workforce, financial and clinical priorities shaping pharmacy today. Becker’s is where candid discussions flourish and new ideas thrive. Becker's 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit
