The proposal calls for a smaller replacement hospital that would open in 2023, with 106 beds as opposed to the current 200-plus beds. For this reason, administration officials are contending the project would be economically viable, the article noted.
Although the city should play a role in solving the medical disparities vulnerable residents face, The Post argues building a hospital without considering alternate options is misguided.
“Think of what could be done with $300 million invested in preventive care, improved maternity and infant health programs, enhanced mental-health services, targeted acute care and other methods that have proved successful elsewhere,” the op-ed reads. “The political tunnel vision propelling the bid for a new hospital needs to end, and there should be thoughtful discussion of how best to serve health needs east of the river.”
More articles on facilities management:
United Medical Center’s replacement hospital could be half its current size: 5 things to know
Why 2 Virginia health systems bought joint stake to sponsor city’s public transit system
4 hospitals planning facility upgrades, expansions
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
