The proposal calls for a smaller replacement hospital that would open in 2023, with 106 beds as opposed to the current 200-plus beds. For this reason, administration officials are contending the project would be economically viable, the article noted.
Although the city should play a role in solving the medical disparities vulnerable residents face, The Post argues building a hospital without considering alternate options is misguided.
“Think of what could be done with $300 million invested in preventive care, improved maternity and infant health programs, enhanced mental-health services, targeted acute care and other methods that have proved successful elsewhere,” the op-ed reads. “The political tunnel vision propelling the bid for a new hospital needs to end, and there should be thoughtful discussion of how best to serve health needs east of the river.”
More articles on facilities management:
United Medical Center’s replacement hospital could be half its current size: 5 things to know
Why 2 Virginia health systems bought joint stake to sponsor city’s public transit system
4 hospitals planning facility upgrades, expansions
