For the study, a team of researchers examined how EHR implementations affected orthopedic surgeons in an outpatient setting using advanced cost accounting methods. Specifically, the researchers timed 143 patient visits before the clinics’ systemwide EHR implementations and again two, six and 24 months after the implementation.
Here are five study findings:
1. Total labor costs per patient visit increased significantly two months after the EHR implementation (from $36.88 to $46.04), due to surgeons spending more time per patient, as well as certified medical assistants spending more time assessing patients.
2. Notably, providers were spending more than twice as long documenting patient encounters two months after the EHR implementation (7.6 minutes compared with 3.3 minutes).
3. Six months after the EHR implementation, total labor costs were similar to those before implementation (from $36.88 to $38.75).
4. Labor costs continued to stay relatively unchanged two years after the implementation (from $36.88 to $37.73).
5. After the initial learning period following an EHR implementation, providers spent more time documenting encounters (8.43 minutes compared with 3.28 minutes) and less time interacting with patients (10.03 minutes compared with 14.65 minutes).
To download the complete study, click here.
More articles on EHRs:
DrChrono allows developers to build apps on EHR with updated API
EHR vendors stock report: Week of Sept. 17-20
CareCloud uses Google’s healthcare APIs to improve EHR data sharing
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
