Researchers recruited 135 volunteers at the University of Guanajuato in Mexico for the study. Each volunteer had four spots designated on his or her inner arm: an unscrubbed control area, an area scrubbed with water, an area scrubbed with triclosan and an area scrubbed with chlorhexidine. Researchers cultured each area at zero, three and 24 hours.
They found that at 24 hours, the area scrubbed with chlorhexidine had less bacteria than the areas scrubbed with water or triclosan.
“Chlorhexidine is the best antiseptic option when a prolonged antiseptic effect is needed; for instance, when implanting medical devices or performing surgical procedures,” the authors concluded.
More articles on chlorhexidine:
CDC prevention interventions prove effective in long-term reduction of bloodstream infections, research shows
Can chlorhexidine wipes prevent drug-resistant HAIs in the ICU?
Chlorhexidine skin prep beats iodine in SSI prevention study
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
