Hospital insurance claims probably not best way to track surgical site infections, study finds

Hospital claims data may not be adequate to track surgical site infections, a study published in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology found.

Advertisement

The researchers compared data from the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network database to hospital insurance claims data for infections after colon surgery in 155 hospitals.

The study revealed significant discrepancies between the two data sources, particularly among hospitals in the South and those that care for more Medicaid patients and highlighted the CDC database’s importance for determining hospital quality.

A single, agreed-upon national set of definitions and data is of greater importance for public reporting and value-based payment programs than hospital claims data, the researchers concluded.

More articles on clinical leadership and infection control:
More NPs giving primary care in places underserved by physicians, study finds
AI algorithm can detect genetic conditions from just a photo
Connecticut hospitals saw spike in patient deaths linked to falls, burns in 2017

Advertisement

Next Up in Clinical Leadership & Infection Control

Advertisement

Comments are closed.