According to one poll, 47 percent of respondents said they would be less likely to vote for members of Congress who support shutting down the federal government if the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act isn’t defunded.
History also suggests this could occur. Newt Gingrich led the charge to cut federal spending that resulted in two government shutdowns in the mid-1990s, which proved costly to both the federal government and the conservative party. According to a CBS News report that examined the Office of Management and Budget’s analysis of the 1995 and 1996 shutdowns:
“[The] two government shutdowns in 1995 and 1996, totaling 27 days, cost the federal government $1.4 billion. That’s over $2 billion in today’s dollars on costs like back pay to furloughed federal workers and uncollected fines and taxes. That number doesn’t begin to account for intangible losses in worker morale and productivity, and confidence in the federal government.”
While polls suggest support for ObamaCare has dropped among Americans, do Americans’ distaste for government shutdowns outweigh this?
According to an NPR article on “A Short History of Government Shutdowns,” the shutdown of 1995 actually helped President Clinton win reelection. (For the record Newt Gingrich is critical of the current shutdown). Will the shutdown of 2013 have a similar unintended result in garnering favor for the Democrats?
What do you think?