The idea of cooperation vs. competition came up again a few days later as I was meeting with Chris Van Gorder, CEO of San Diego-based Scripps Health, at the American College of Healthcare Executives’ annual Congress on Healthcare Leadership in Chicago. Van Gorder was a recipient of this year’s ACHE Gold Award, the association’s highest award for leadership in the industry.
“It’s harder to collaborate than compete,” Van Gorder told me, but added that collaboration will be critical as healthcare organizations move toward population health management while lowering cost structures. “As healthcare changes, there’s going to be more collaboration.”
A testament of its ability to collaborate, Scripps recently opened its Scripps Proton Therapy Center, which will be affiliated with Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego and the UC San Diego Health System.
The center is an example of what Van Gorder dubbed “co-ompetition.” The organizations still compete for some services, but they’ve come together for one type of service.
So while things are certainly easier when the bottom line is shared, there are still (and will likely be in the future) opportunities for successful collaboration.
Just ask Mike Leavitt, and former secretary of the HHS as well as a three-term governor of Utah, whose new book “Finding Allies, Building Alliances,” explores how an increasingly “networked” world will lead to more organizations coming together to meet mutual goals.
Collaborations can work, but they aren’t as easy as just owning it all. Sometimes, though owning it all just isn’t an option.
Thus, perhaps the answer to the question “are affiliations sustainable?” has more to do with the leaders guiding them than the environment outside them.