The study, presented at a recent meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, randomly selected 300 radiologists from the Society of International Radiology’s website. Researchers then analyzed 1,964 five-star online reviews and 139 less than five-star reviews for those physicians. Variables included rating, wait time, insurance accepted, patient satisfaction, cultural competency, procedural outcomes, bedside manner and patient education.
Here are three findings:
1. Patients who underwent procedures accounted for 52% of five-star reviews, but also accounted for 72% of less than five-star reviews and negative comments.
2. Positive clinical reviews were focused on medical explanations, while negative feedback focused on procedural outcomes and inadequate patient education (78% and 13%, respectively).
3. Positive nonclinical remarks focused on good bedside manner and culturally sensitive care (82% and 78%, respectively). Negative comments frequently noted poor bedside manner (92%) and long wait times (59%).
“Addressing these aspects can enhance patient experience and overall healthcare quality in interventional radiology,” the study authors said.
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.