Study: Visual Inspection at Least as Effective as Commercial Evaluations for Environmental Clean

Visual inspection is at least as effective as commercial, non-biological methods of determining post-discharge environmental clean, according to a study published in Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.

Advertisement

Evaluating methods with 15 types of high-touch surface, researchers compared the visual clean standard with fluorescent marker removal and adensosine triphosphate quantification. All non-biologic methods were compared to a culture for aerobic colony counts as a control.

They found the following results for each method’s demonstration of clean, sensitivity to clean surfaces and specificity to detect a clean surface:

  • Aerobic colony culture — 72% clean, comparison standard, comparison standard)
  • Visual clean — 57% clean, 60% sensitivity, 52% specificity
  • Fluorescent marker — 49% clean, 51% sensitivity, 56% specificity
  • ATP quantification — 66% clean, 71% sensitivity, 44% specificity

Researchers concluded visual inspection is an acceptable and cheap alternative to non-biologic evaluations of post-discharge clean. 

More Articles on Quality:

Bullying, Intimidation Staples of Hospital Workplaces, Study Shows

Study: Physicians Reduce Unsafe Behavior When Confronted by Peers

Patient Safety Tool: Home Healthcare Blueprint for Excellence

Becker’s 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit is the top tier event that the people leading the future of pharmacy convene. This 3-day event is built specifically for Chief Pharmacy Officers and senior pharmacy leaders. The sessions examine the workforce, financial and clinical priorities shaping pharmacy today. Becker’s is where candid discussions flourish and new ideas thrive. Becker's 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit

Advertisement

Next Up in Clinical Leadership & Infection Control

Advertisement

Comments are closed.