Evaluating methods with 15 types of high-touch surface, researchers compared the visual clean standard with fluorescent marker removal and adensosine triphosphate quantification. All non-biologic methods were compared to a culture for aerobic colony counts as a control.
They found the following results for each method’s demonstration of clean, sensitivity to clean surfaces and specificity to detect a clean surface:
- Aerobic colony culture — 72% clean, comparison standard, comparison standard)
- Visual clean — 57% clean, 60% sensitivity, 52% specificity
- Fluorescent marker — 49% clean, 51% sensitivity, 56% specificity
- ATP quantification — 66% clean, 71% sensitivity, 44% specificity
Researchers concluded visual inspection is an acceptable and cheap alternative to non-biologic evaluations of post-discharge clean.
More Articles on Quality:
Bullying, Intimidation Staples of Hospital Workplaces, Study Shows
Study: Physicians Reduce Unsafe Behavior When Confronted by Peers
Patient Safety Tool: Home Healthcare Blueprint for Excellence
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.