Recent bills in the state’s House and Senate sought to support struggling community hospitals by taxing larger systems and insurers. The proposals drew criticism from a number of key industry stakeholders. Though the Massachusetts Health Policy Commission exists to perform legislative reviews, there is no protocol forcing lawmakers to submit bills to this organization.
Dr. McDonough writes that state legislators should adopt the Congressional Budget Office’s model and perform analyses for all healthcare proposals to ensure people understand their potential effects.
“I suggest that in their adoption of joint rules for the 2019-20 legislative session, the House and Senate include that any major health legislation produced by either the House or Senate should be ‘scored’ by the Health Policy Commission,” Dr. McDonough writes. “Healthcare is deviously complex, important, costly, and notoriously prone to unintended consequences. A benchmark analysis would help legislators, the administration, interest groups, and citizens to understand the consequences of major system changes.”
More articles on leadership and management:
47-hospital Adventist Health System changes name
5 ways leaders can draw candid feedback from their teams
Affordable drug advocates dedicate $500K to unseat California congresswoman
At Becker's 4th Annual CEO + CFO Roundtable, taking place November 2–5 in Chicago, more than 1,500 hospital and health system executives tackle decisions that determine whether organizations thrive or merely survive: protecting margins under cost pressure, choosing where to grow, renegotiating payer relationships, stabilizing the workforce and proving real ROI on technology. This is where leaders work through them together, face-to-face. Apply for complimentary registration now.