Researchers at the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago conducted a literature review, interviews, a comprehensive environment scan and a series of site visits to federally qualified health centers between April and September 2010.
Four systems were used across the six test sites: MedLynks, WorldVistA, OpenMRS and ClearHealth.
Discovered advantages of the open EHR systems include:
• Appropriate level of functionality
• Easy to download and install
• Able to modify the EHR system to fit the needs of the facility
• Lower acquisition and implementation costs (30 to 60 percent less than commercial systems)
• Inherent interoperability found in many open-source systems
Discovered disadvantages include:
• Some design flaws that were not apparent during initial implementation
• Need for a higher level of technical skill among IT staff to fully utilize the software
• Continuing stigma against the use of open-source EHRs
More Articles on EHRs:
Study: EHRs Linked to Cost Savings in Outpatient Settings
HHS’ Dr. Farzad Mostashari: EHRs Improve Patient Safety
AMA Releases Best Practices for Using EHRs Around Patients
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
