Here are four takeaways from the article.
1. Although U.S. policymakers could help improve patient outcomes and healthcare prices, they are more likely to focus on the healthcare job booms in their own states as an “economic win” rather than considering whether these jobs equate to better health for Americans across the nation, Mr. Patel wrote.
2. Labor costs account for over half of the total cost of healthcare delivery, Mr. Patel noted. As a result, when healthcare employment rises, healthcare prices rise too. These costs are then distributed to employers and patients through health insurance premiums, which increase at a rate that outpaces inflation.
3. Additionally, Mr. Patel argues the job boom does not necessarily translate to better quality healthcare, since the rapid employment growth is largely attributed to the addition of administrative and management jobs as opposed to more clinicians.
4. The nation’s administrative healthcare costs are the highest in the developed world, accounting for over one-fourth of the sector’s spending, Mr. Patel wrote. Despite this surge in healthcare prices, Capitol Hill policymakers tend to support this growth, seeing it as a benefit for employment in their own district. “As job growth and industry consolidation leads many hospitals to become their district’s largest employer, politicians will see less and less incentive to bend the cost curve of healthcare.”
More articles on workforce:
Mercy Health seeks to fill more than 60 positions in Ohio community
Fewer than 40% of workers receive flu shot at some California hospitals: 5 things to know
Atrium Health cuts labor costs, affecting 90 positions: 11 things to know
