The researchers — led by James R. Langabeer of the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston — identified 5,570 patients who were treated through a telehealth intervention. Through this intervention, 911 patients underwent a remote consultation with an EMS physician, who determined whether the patient needed to be transported to a hospital emergency department.
For patients with non-urgent conditions, the EMS physician scheduled alternative transportation to an affiliated primary care clinic, rather than providing all patients with ambulance transportation to an ED. This program led to a 6.7 percent reduction in potentially medically unnecessary ED visits and a 44-minute reduction in ambulance back-in-service times.
“Patient care enabled by telehealth in a pre-hospital environment is a more cost effective alternative to the traditional EMS ‘treat and transport to ED’ model,” the researchers concluded. They also noted that the intervention led to $2,468 in cost savings per averted ED visit.
More articles on telehealth:
Teladoc enters 1st home care partnership
The top 5 reasons N.Y. residents avoid telemedicine
Survey: Only 9% of healthcare providers feel ‘very comfortable’ with telemedicine
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.