Restricting resident work hours does not improve surgical patient safety: 5 things to know

In July 2011, work hour restrictions for resident physicians were revised in order to protect patients against trainee fatigue-related errors, apparently to little effect, according to new research published online in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

Advertisement

Here are five things to know about the research.

• Changing the work hour restrictions have not had the desired effect of lowering postoperative complication rates in several surgical specialties.
• There was no significant difference in measured surgical patient outcomes between one year before and two years after the 2011 work hour reform went into effect.

• The researchers examined five surgical specialties, and after controlling for external factors that could influence surgical outcomes, found no significant association between the work reform and the number of 30-day patient deaths and serious postoperative complications in the two years that followed, or either year separately.
• Prior studies concluded that the 2011 work hour restriction did not affect patient outcomes for general surgical patients either.
• “Our finding suggests the ACGME reform is not meeting its goal of improved patient safety in surgery,” Ravi Rajaram, MD, lead investigator for the research, said in a statement. He concludes that additional work is needed to determine how to best structure resident hours to improve patient outcomes.

More articles on clinical quality:

100 Patient Safety Benchmarks | 2015
Physicians miss glaring signs of sepsis: 6 things to know
Readmissions for sepsis more common, costly than heart complications: 7 key study findings

Advertisement

Next Up in Clinical Leadership & Infection Control

Advertisement

Comments are closed.