Population Health Improves, But Probably Not Because of Healthcare Providers

A healthy population. This is the mission of nearly every healthcare organization in the country, and yet, as a country, we’ve fallen short.
We are less healthy than other industrialized nations, even though we spend more money on healthcare.
As healthcare delivery moves from episodic to continuous, fragmented to holistic, and from fee-for-service to pay-for-performance — either through reimbursements that correlate with quality, or through providers taking on financial risk for outcomes and population health — this will hopefully change.
In fact, a new study released yesterday suggests Americans have made some progress: According to the United Health Foundation’s most recent America’s Health Rankings, Americans have improved upon two-thirds of health measures examined by the ranking.
The most notable gains were seen in smoking rates, which dropped from 21.2 percent of the adult population to 19.6 percent. Physical inactivity decreased from 26.2 percent of the adult population to 22.9 percent, and America’s obesity rate remained approximately the same as reported in 2012.This marks the first time since 1998 that obesity rates have not worsened. (To see complete report, including a ranking of health measures by state, visit www.americashealthrankings.org.)
Despite these gains, there is much work to be done to maintain and improve the health of our nation. According to the Foundation:

Advertisement

“When it comes to improving the nation’s health, there is still much to be done. Obesity has leveled off; however, it must remain a top priority, as 27.6 percent of adults nationwide report being obese. With rates of physical inactivity, smoking and diabetes at 22.9 percent, 19.6 percent and 9.7 percent, respectively, there is still considerable room for improvement in key health measures.”

In fact, the recent gains in smoking and obesity rates may be due more to popular public health campaigns (e.g., state funding from tobacco settlements for “stop smoking”
campaigns and First Lady Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move!” campaign) than to proactive physicians engaging their patients in healthier lifestyles.

Healthcare providers want to keep patients healthy, but so far this desire hasn’t translated to significant gains in overall population health.

Why?

 

Any healthcare executive knows why. It’s because the financials don’t align with this model. While there is no doubt the tide is shifting, it’s happening slowly. Today, if a hospital-based health system successfully helped its patient population manage their chronic conditions, significant lowered smoking and obesity rates, and provided such great post-discharge care that no patient was unnecessarily readmitted, it would run itself out of business. Hospitals can’t change until the payment mechanisms catch up, and the responsibility for that lies with payers.

 

To make true gains, and do so quickly, payers must incentivize providers to manage population health, and then, boards must incentivize leaders to achieve real gains.

Within the last 5-10 years, patient experience has grown in importance among health system benchmarking and goal setting. Why? Because payers are tying payment to it, and, as a result, boards are tying executive compensation to it. When top leaders are paid to improve population health, I expect we’ll start seeing improvement. But first, providers must agree to take on the risk, and payers must agree to reimburse for it.

 

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Public Health

Advertisement

Comments are closed.