When CMS released its latest Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings in May, Yale New Haven (Conn.) Health’s flagship hospital earned five stars, placing it among the largest hospitals in the country to do so.
The result was more than three years in the making, and the leaders who drove it say the rating was a byproduct of a more fundamental effort: rebuilding the infrastructure and culture around quality and safety from the ground up.
Yale New Haven Hospital is a 1,500-bed safety-net institution and quaternary care center, serving a high-Medicaid, high-complexity population. For hospitals in that position, patient complexity, social determinants and payer mix all create pressures that peer institutions without safety-net obligations don’t face to the same degree.
“What is in our control is how we architect ourselves and choose to respond to some of the external pressures and some of the external factors,” Kate Heilpern, MD, president of Yale New Haven Hospital and executive vice president of Yale New Haven Health, said during an upcoming episode of the “Becker’s Healthcare Clinical Leadership Podcast.”
In 2022, Deborah Rhodes, MD, a professor of medicine and chief quality officer of Yale Medicine and Yale New Haven Health System, began building what Dr. Rhodes calls a “whole system quality” framework, which represents a deliberate break from the scorecard-driven quality approach commonly used among health systems.
“Quality and safety had become synonymous with a dry scorecard of reportable metrics that were tracking a relatively small number of adverse outcomes that occur in the hospital,” Dr. Rhodes said. “Instead, we wanted to inspire and reframe what quality means to everyone who works in our health system, and make it recognizable and meaningful and actionable to them.”
Building the pyramid
The organizing metaphor Dr. Rhodes used to structure the redesign was a pyramid. The foundation of the pyramid required the system to first define roles and accountability for everyone who touches quality, safety and equity, including board and executive leadership, clinical leaders at all levels and front-line staff.
As part of this effort, leaders also restructured and standardized its quality and safety team. Prior to 2022, quality and safety roles were embedded across different hospitals, departments and service lines, with no shared data definitions, no common performance priorities and no standard job descriptions for equivalent roles.
“The same role might have an entirely different job description, because the reporting structures were so complex,” Dr. Rhodes said. “By bringing those under one standard reporting structure and standardizing those roles, we were able much more efficiently to move toward those agreed-upon quality objectives.”
Onto that foundational layer, the team built standard work: uniform metrics, standard data sources, standard data definitions, a single performance improvement methodology and scorecards that extended from system-level priorities down to the service line and department. The goal was not just to know how the hospital was performing, but to ensure every team understood its specific contribution to systemwide quality objectives.
Next, the system rolled out new operational structures, including:
- Daily management boards and tiered huddles
- Twenty-two care signature councils (one for each service line and department)
- Governing best-practice standards for every condition in the system’s care portfolio
- Safety-forward platforms targeting recurrent vulnerabilities, such as medication safety and hospital-associated infections.
The explicit goal driving all of it, Dr. Rhodes said, was reaching the top decile of academic medical centers on every quality measure, and doing so in a way that “touched every patient with every condition in every setting” across the system.
Culture and the leadership layer
Dr. Heilpern arrived in 2024 and took a hands-on approach to the cultural side of the transformation, rebuilding how leadership communicates with the hospital’s 15,000 staff members. She reimagined a leadership meeting structure that expanded well beyond the traditional management audience to include system managers and physician leaders across its two campuses.
“To see that sort of connection as people are gathering, and to hear their stories, and to have them communicate, ask questions and offer their input — I think has given the hospital, as a whole, if it were a living, breathing organism, a true sense of self-efficacy,” Dr. Heilpern said.
Dr. Rhodes also credited Dr. Heilpern’s visible presence across the hospital through daily rounding, direct engagement with front-line staff and consistent communication of the “why” behind quality goals as a key catalyst for the cultural shift.
“It’s been an enormous organizational change, but it’s really been an incredible cultural change,” Dr. Heilpern said. “Moving thousands of people in a unified direction toward a single purpose and a single goal — it’s taken a couple of years, but everybody’s at a place where they really understand now the why, the purpose behind this journey, and what their role is in it.”
Advice for other systems
For health system leaders trying to improve their own quality performance, Dr. Rhodes offered three pieces of advice.
First, focus. “Identify your most compelling quality and safety priorities, and hone into those rather than trying to boil the ocean,” she said, adding that those priorities need to be tracked in real-time data rather than through CMS metrics that may lag performance by a year or more.
Second, standardize. Dr. Rhodes noted an organization’s performance could look “stellar or dismal,” depending on how it defines and tracks the quality data. “Being extraordinarily transparent and consistent about those definitions and metrics is critical,” she said.
That standardization also has to extend to team member accountability. Quality teams alone cannot operationalize quality improvement. Defined roles across every department are required.
Third, keep the patient visible in the data. “Every time we improve quality and safety, we improve the lives of patients,” she said. “If you somehow miss that connection, you will never meaningfully improve quality and safety.”
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.