To assess the possible role of implicit gender bias in medical training programs, researchers examined 33,456 competency evaluations of 359 emergency medicine residents conducted by 285 faculty members working at eight community and academic emergency medicine training programs across the country.
Researchers found females outperformed their male counterparts during the first year of residency in 15 of 23 performance areas assessed — scores were notably higher in accountability, multitasking and diagnosis. However, by the end of the third year and final year of residency, males on average received higher scores in all 23 categories of evaluation. Additionally, male residents had a 13 percent higher rate of milestone achievement by graduation, which amounts to approximately three to four months of additional training.
“We are concerned that the disparity we discovered in evaluations may point to an implicit bias … rather than a deficit in specific skills or knowledge,” said Daniel O’Connor, study co-author and a student in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
The study’s authors concluded further studies are needed to better understand the potential role of gender bias in medical training.
More articles on physician issues:
Why NewYork-Presbyterian cannot select cardiothoracic residents this Match Day
65% of patients see physicians who’ve accepted money from drug, device industry
Dr. Thomas E. Starzi, first surgeon to perform liver transplant, dies at 90
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
