The lawsuit contends the Medicaid expansion amounts to a tax, and cites a state constitutional requirement that new taxes be approved by two-thirds of the state legislators. The Medicaid expansion passed with a simple majority in June. The suit also contends the expansion gives the director of Arizona’s Medicaid agency an unconstitutional power to levy taxes by deciding which hospitals will be exempt.
“By enacting a tax without the two-thirds majority required by our Constitution, the state has disenfranchised citizens whose representatives opposed the tax,” Christina Sandefur, an attorney for Goldwater Institute, the conservative advocacy group pursuing the case on behalf of the legislators, told The Sacramento Bee. “Legislators are beholden to their constituents, but bureaucrats have no such accountability.”
More Articles on Medicaid Expansion:
Gov. Snyder Signs Michigan Medicaid Expansion Bill
Pennsylvania to Accept Federal Funds for Medicaid-Like Program
Study: Potential New Medicaid Enrollees Under PPACA Healthier Than Current Beneficiaries
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
