Medicare allows some hospitals to be simultaneously classified as “rural” and “urban.” The “rural” classification allows hospitals to get lower drug pricing and the “urban” classification ensures they can attract and pay qualified staff, according to the report.
However, under HHS’ “reclassification rule,” implemented in 2000, hospitals could not be deemed urban by the agency’s Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board if they have a rural classification to reduce drug prices.
In December 2014, a judge dismissed a challenge to the rule, holding it was vital to clarify ambiguous Medicare regulations. But the plaintiff in the case, Lawrence + Memorial Hospital in New London, Conn., was issued a win on Thursday when Judge Jed Rakoff, writing for the appeals court, said HHS lacked authority to pass the regulation and that the rule conflicted with the plain meaning of the federal Medicare statute.
The hospital’s lawyer, Joseph Glazer, said his client is pleased with the decision. A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Deirdre Daly in Connecticut, who defended the HHS regulation, told Reuters, “The Justice Department and HHS are reviewing the decision to determine how best to proceed.”
More articles on health law:
9 latest healthcare industry lawsuits, settlements
Battle over Illinois hospital tax exemptions heads back to court
Kentucky surgeon faces terroristic threat charge
Becker’s 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit is the top tier event that the people leading the future of pharmacy convene. This 3-day event is built specifically for Chief Pharmacy Officers and senior pharmacy leaders. The sessions examine the workforce, financial and clinical priorities shaping pharmacy today. Becker’s is where candid discussions flourish and new ideas thrive. Becker's 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit