The two-hospital, 500-physician system was all set to roll out patient-written critiques and star reviews of its physicians, but felt it would be unfair to patients to publish the information without first notifying them that their comments would be public, according to the report.
The reviews do not include patient names, but patients could have included other personal information, that taken together could identify them. The system is redistributing patient surveys with a disclosure statement for extra precaution and courtesy, according to the report.
More articles on integration and physician issues:
This med school is focusing as much on public health policy as anatomy
Stanford Health Care will be medical provider at U.S. Women’s Open
Public largely supports physician-assisted death, regardless of ethnicity
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.