In a study of 218 Australian Royal Marine recruits, Kim Peters, PhD, and Alex Haslam, PhD, tracked the self-identification results of the recruits over the course of a 32-week infantry training program that culminated in the award of the Commando Medal for leadership to one recruit, as voted by their commanders.
The researchers found recruits who considered themselves natural leaders often were not able to convince their peers of this ability, while individuals who considered themselves good followers often emerged as leaders.
“Evaluators who are situated within the group, and able to personally experience the capacity of group members to influence one another, appear to recognize the leadership of those who see themselves as followers,” Dr. Peters and Dr. Haslam wrote. “In contrast, those who stand outside the group appear to be most attuned to a candidate’s correspondence to generic ideas of what a leader should look like.”
More articles on leadership and management:
How the UK plans to attack physician staffing shortages after Brexit
Billionaire investor’s free mental health clinics for veterans draw scrutiny
Corner Office: Keck Medicine of USC CEO Tom Jackiewicz wants you to remember that the numbers are people
At Becker's 4th Annual CEO + CFO Roundtable, taking place November 2–5 in Chicago, more than 1,500 hospital and health system executives tackle decisions that determine whether organizations thrive or merely survive: protecting margins under cost pressure, choosing where to grow, renegotiating payer relationships, stabilizing the workforce and proving real ROI on technology. This is where leaders work through them together, face-to-face. Apply for complimentary registration now.