People don’t like algorithms making moral decisions, U of C study finds

As algorithms make more choices in our daily lives, from the advertisements we see to the shows we watch to whom we date, people are uncomfortable when those decisions involve moral issues, according to a University of Chicago Booth School of Business study.

Advertisement

Researchers asked 700 study participants to consider whether they’d continue doing business with a health insurance company that used algorithms to make decisions on customers’ health plans. The study found a strong correlation with those people wanting to switch insurers.

In another experiment, study participants expressed concerns with insurance companies’ decisions to save money by not covering certain medications, but still trusted people to make those choices instead of computers.

“If a decision has a clear moral impact, an organization should consider giving a human the final say,” journalist Kasandra Brabaw wrote in a Chicago Booth Review article summarizing the findings. “That way, the organization can capitalize on algorithms’ ability to often make better predictions than humans, but the final decision will feel more acceptable.”

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Register to Attend Webinar

The hidden cost of lost clinical time and how leading health systems are responding

Friday, August 7
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CDT

Presenters: Kassaundra McKnight-Young, Zebra TechnologiesGregory Carras, Zebra TechnologiesJennifer Gene, Levata

Advertisement

Next Up in Artificial Intelligence

Advertisement

Comments are closed.