5 clinical decision support platforms ranked by KLAS 

COVID-19 cost pressures, system updates and the urge to standardize care have pushed hospitals and health systems to reevaluate their existing clinical decision support tools, according to a recent KLAS Research report

Advertisement

For its CDS Point of Care Reference 2021 report, KLAS interviewed thousands of healthcare professionals over the past year to understand their satisfaction with and perceptions of their clinical decision support platforms. 

Here are five clinical decision support platforms’ overall product scores, based on a 100-point scale. Scores with an asterisk represent a platform that had limited data for the analysis. 

  • EBSCO Information Services: 91.7
  • EBSCO & IBM’s DynaMed and Micromedex: 89.1* 
  • Wolters Kluwer: 87.9 
  • IBM Watson Health: 87.4 
  • Elsevier: 84.0 

Here are five clinical decision support platforms’ scores for driving tangible outcomes, based on a nine-point scale. Scores with an asterisk represent a platform that had limited data for the analysis. 

  • EBSCO Information Services: 8.2
  • EBSCO & IBM’s DynaMed and Micromedex: 7.7 
  • Wolters Kluwer: 7.6
  • IBM Watson Health: 7.7 
  • Elsevier: 7.1

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Register to Attend Webinar

The hidden cost of lost clinical time and how leading health systems are responding

Friday, August 7
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CDT

Presenters: Kassaundra McKnight-Young, Zebra TechnologiesGregory Carras, Zebra TechnologiesJennifer Gene, Levata

Advertisement

Next Up in Health IT

Advertisement

Comments are closed.