NPs weren’t born yesterday: The role emerged in the 1960s during another time of projected physician shortage. Today, the country’s primary care physician shortage is very real, paired with growing demand for services from the healthcare reform law’s newly insured and an aging baby boomer population.
There have been small but steady steps toward expanded roles for APRNs recently. You may notice many TV commercials use the term “Please talk to your healthcare provider” now in lieu of the traditional “Please talk to your doctor” line. Last week, the Federal Trade Commission said the elimination of certain supervision requirements for NPs and nurse anesthetists would likely benefit competition in Massachusetts — a perspective that makes for an important business-minded argument.
And the country’s largest healthcare system with more than 1,700 hospitals in all 50 states — the Veterans Health Administration — is in midst of a dispute about a proposal to let APRNs practice without physician supervision, even in states that have laws requiring oversight. (The opposition and support for that proposal is nearly even to a tee: More than 60 states and national physician groups have signed a letter with their “strong concerns” to the Department of Veterans Affairs, whereas about 40 nursing organizations have endorsed letters applauding the proposed changes.)
It seems inevitable that physician extenders will be more involved in care, especially in light of our country’s subpar access to primary care providers. The U.S. came in dead-last out of the 11 countries in a November 2013 Commonwealth Fund study for after-hours primary care. Only 35 percent of adults’ primary care physician practices have arrangements for patients to see physicians or nurses after hours. (In the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, this figure is 95 percent.)
Those are just a few recent happenings and forces that suggest APRNs’ roles in care delivery may expand more quickly than opinions on the matter can dictate. In light of this, patients and providers need reliable information on consumer opinions rather than conflicting, blanket poll numbers. This can no longer be treated as a game of nationwide he-says/she-says.
But even if such opinion polls continue to persist (and I expect they will), it would be helpful if more questions or results were categorized, such as by age group or acuity of care. How do younger patients feel about APRN-led care delivery versus a those who are 65 years or older? How does someone with several chronic diseases feel about it compared to a patient who visits her provider for an annual physical exam?
Some studies have taken these steps, but more results like this could break down blanket “majority opinions” to better understand which patients are most uncomfortable receiving care from professionals other than their physicians. Findings like this could leave healthcare providers in a better position to address those concerns — to “put the patient first” as so many hospitals and health systems claim to do.
And for the patients out there: Think twice before letting these surveys shape your opinion — whatever it is — on who delivers your care. In a few months, another poll may show completely different results.