Kaiser’s analysis looked at the potential implications of a premium support Medicare system and how it would affect Medicare premiums. It also defined a premium support approach as one where the federal government contributes a fixed amount for each Medicare beneficiary that would go toward the premium of a health insurance plan compared with the current system where Medicare beneficiaries are entitled to a determined set of benefits and the government covering the costs of those services.
The study found that a majority of all Medicare beneficiaries, 59 percent total, would most likely have to pay higher Medicare premiums than they do under the current Medicare system if they wanted the same plan and benefits. The reason? Those beneficiaries would be in health plans that cost more than a benchmark plan in their area, which would have fewer benefits. On average, enrollees in the traditional Medicare program would pay $60 per month more in additional premiums, while enrollees in private plans would pay roughly $87 per month more.
While GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) have proposed a similar plan, Kaiser said its report is not an analysis of their particular proposal because “such an analysis would require additional, more detailed policy specifications than are available.”
More Articles on Medicare:
Report: PPACA to Cut $12.7B in Annual Medicare Advantage Overpayments
Study: Medicare Has Overpaid Private Insurers $283B Since 1985
MedPAC’s October Meeting: 4 Things to Know
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
