The attorney general filed suit against Hamilton Law Group and its president, James Havassy, in May 2015, alleging the firm used the state’s Filial Responsibility Law to improperly coerce payments from debtors’ relatives, according to The Morning Call.
Under the Filial Responsibility Law, a court order is required before trying to collect from a debtor’s relative. The Pennsylvania Attorney General claimed Hamilton Law Group violated the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law by using the Filial Responsibility Law as an ordinary method of medical debt collection when a court order had not been issued. For instance, the attorney general alleged the firm pursued one man for his father’s cardiology bill without a court order indicating the son was responsible for the debt.
Under the settlement, Hamilton Law Group and Mr. Havassy are required to pay a $3,000 fine, $366 in restitution, $3,000 in investigative costs and $65 in court costs. The firm also agreed to remove any negative reports with national credit bureaus that were filed due to the use of the allegedly improper collection practices and to stop all collection efforts based solely on the Filial Responsibility Law, according to the report.
More articles on healthcare industry lawsuits:
Physician who falsely diagnosed 387 patients gets 4-year prison term
13 recent healthcare industry lawsuits, settlements
Judge reduces $500M damages against DePuy in hip implants verdict
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.