Group Health Plans May Be More Cost Effective for Employers Than Exchanges

Employers will likely pay more if they shift group health plan benefits to federally-subsidized exchanges created under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, according to a new white paper.

Advertisement

The white paper, released by Truven Health Analytics — formerly the healthcare business of Thomson Reuters — concludes that employers could pays as much as $17,269 per employee to shift benefits to federally subsidized coverage starting in 2014. That per-employee expense is roughly $9,000 more than employers currently pay to cover each employee on a group health plan.

If employers decide to eliminate group health plans altogether without providing a subsidy to employees, each employee would pay an average of $16,551 per year for health coverage in 2014, according to the white paper’s findings. Under this scenario, employers would pay a penalty for not covering employees, but reduce annual healthcare costs.

However, the white paper concludes that eliminating health coverage may not be in a company’s business interest and “may potentially have a large impact on an employer’s competitive market position for retaining and recruiting talent.”  

More Articles Related to Health Insurance Exchanges:

HHS Expands Funding, Guidance of Health Insurance Exchanges
78% of Americans Who Qualify for Health Insurance Subsidies Never Heard of Exchanges
New Bill Would Block IRS Tax Credits for Health Exchanges

Becker’s 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit is the top tier event that the people leading the future of pharmacy convene. This 3-day event is built specifically for Chief Pharmacy Officers and senior pharmacy leaders. The sessions examine the workforce, financial and clinical priorities shaping pharmacy today. Becker’s is where candid discussions flourish and new ideas thrive. Becker's 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit

Advertisement

Next Up in Financial Management

Advertisement

Comments are closed.