The Aug. 13 study evaluated financial performance data from all four CMS ACO programs from 2005 to 2018. The researchers — Kip Sullivan, member of the advisory board of Health Care for All Minnesota, and James Kahn, MD, emeritus professor of health policy at the University of California San Francisco — looked at net cost to CMS, or gross savings in medical billing minus bonus payments to ACOs.
What the study authors found is overall, ACOs largely broke even. When CMS subtracted bonuses from gross savings, the ACOs either lost or saved a few tenths of a percent.
The researchers said they “omitted ACO overhead costs, which are not reported. While they do not affect CMS net costs, they do influence provider costs. MedPAC estimates overhead for ACO programs at 2 percent of Medicare spending. If ACOs save CMS and providers at most a few percent, this implies that ACOs are actually raising systemwide costs.”
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
