Study Questions Validity of Stroke Quality Measure

A study published in Neurology calls into question the validity of a quality measure that measures 30-day risk-adjusted stroke mortality.

Advertisement

 

The measure is currently being developed for use under healthcare reform, but hospitals have already adopted the measure to demonstrate their performance and quality of services. The study evaluated 436 stroke patients admitted to Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, N.Y., in 2009 with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Of that number, 37 (7.8 percent) either died within 30 days while in the hospital or were discharged to hospice care. Of that number, 36 patients died because of a decision by the patient or family to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining interventions.

The study authors then asked a panel of neurologists to determine whether deceased patients would have survived longer than 30 days if every available medical intervention were employed on a continuous basis. The panel determined that 41 percent of the patients could have been kept alive, effectively reducing the hospital’s mortality rate by 3.2 percent.

More Articles on Quality:

Winning Skeptics Over to Hospitals’ Quality Initiatives

3 Tips for Publicly Reporting Quality Data From Aligning Forces for Quality

CMS Extends Deadline for State Innovation Models Initiative

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Clinical Leadership & Infection Control

Advertisement

Comments are closed.