Study: Administrative Data Fails to Capture All Hospital Infections

Administrative data failed to identify the same infections documented from healthcare-associated infection surveillance, according to a study in the American Journal of Infection Control.

Advertisement

 

Researchers compared infections identified by hospital administrative data with infection surveillance results for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Surveillance data was considered the gold standard, according to the study.

 

 

Administrative data diagnosis codes had a sensitivity of 0 percent, 21 percent and 25 percent for CAUTI, CLABSI and VAP, respectively. The authors suggested hospitals “recognize the need for ongoing scrutiny of appropriate quality measures.”

 

More Articles on Quality Data:

Drs. Donald Berwick, John Toussaint: Medicare Claims Data Should Be More Accessible
Granular Data Drives Targeted Hand Hygiene Compliance Improvement
Study: Readmission Data From American College of Surgeons Program More Accurate Than Administrative Data

Becker’s 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit is the top tier event that the people leading the future of pharmacy convene. This 3-day event is built specifically for Chief Pharmacy Officers and senior pharmacy leaders. The sessions examine the workforce, financial and clinical priorities shaping pharmacy today. Becker’s is where candid discussions flourish and new ideas thrive. Becker's 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit

Advertisement

Next Up in Clinical Leadership & Infection Control

Advertisement

Comments are closed.