“The value signal to consumers and hospitals communicated by grades and penalties is therefore weakened because the methods applied to the same hospital data produce conflicting messages of ‘average grades’ yet ‘bad enough for penalty,'” the researchers said.
The researchers compared Hospital Compare grades for heart failure and acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) readmissions with scores for excess readmissions used to set penalties under the readmissions reduction program for these conditions.
Of the 2,956 hospitals with publicly reported heart failure grades on Hospital Compare, about 92 percent were graded as “no different” than the national rate for heart failure readmissions, but about half (48.6 percent) scored high for heart failure readmissions under the penalty program, and 87 percent received an overall readmissions penalty.
More articles on clinical leadership and infection control:
Safety concerns remain as surgeons explore robot-assisted breast cancer operations
Nursing in 2018: 10 most-read stories
How Sentara hospitals used copper to drop infection rates
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
