The ruling is the third attempt this year to end more than four years of litigation between the Pittsburgh healthcare giants accusing each other of anticompetitive practices.
This ruling would exclude from the agreement a clause Highmark introduced in October that would prevent UPMC from characterizing Highmark as “monopolistic” in litigation brought forth by third parties, including a pending suit in which four plaintiffs are accusing UPMC and Highmark of colluding to inflate prices.
U.S. District Court Judge Joy Flowers Conti was “very disappointed” in Highmark for trying to include the clause in the settlement, according to the report, and will enforce the original mediated resolution without the added provision. As per her ruling, the two organizations now have until Dec. 31 to drop their lawsuits.
More Articles on Highmark and UPMC:
21 Recent Investigations, Lawsuits and Settlements Involving Hospitals
Highmark and UPMC Continue to Battle Over Settlement
UPMC Asks Judge to Enforce Initial Settlement With Highmark
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
