Recent Decisions Provide New Options For Employers in FCA Cases

A series of recent court decisions allows healthcare industry employers to bring counterclaims against whistle-blowers who file cases under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act and do not properly protect confidential information, according to a Forbes report.

Advertisement

In U.S. ex rel. Wildhirt v. AARS Forever, respiratory therapists brought a qui tam lawsuit against their employer under the False Claims Act and alleged their employer was breaching contracts with the Veteran’s Administration. The whistle-blowers had little first hand knowledge about the practices at issue, and instead of alerting their employer of the issues, the employees took documents containing protected health information home without authorization, in violation of HIPAA, to pursue their case. 

The employer brought counterclaims against the employees, as both of the therapists who brought the qui tam suit had signed HIPAA confidentiality agreements, which included language that said the employees would report any suspect practices to their employer before pursuing a qui tam suit. The agreement also said the employees would indemnify their employer for any attorneys’ fees the employer was forced to incur as the result of a qui tam suit where confidential employer information was improperly disclosed, according to the report.

The court ruled employer counterclaims that do not solely seek to indemnify the employer for losses as a result of the lawsuit are permissible in qui tam cases and denied the plaintiffs’ request to dismiss the employers’ counterclaims.

There have been other recent decisions allowing employers to bring counterclaims based on an employee whistle-blower improperly disclosing confidential information, according to the report.

Although the cases provide employers in the healthcare industry with a new way to help defend against qui tam cases, employers must have signed employee agreements in place with language that requires employees to first notify the employer of suspect activity and also allows the employer to recover attorneys’ fees when confidential information is improperly disclosed or taken without authorization.

More Articles on the False Claims Act:

Government Intervenes in False Claims Act Lawsuit Against IPC The Hospitalist 
50 Healthcare Industry Lawsuits, Settlements 
Shands HealthCare to Pay Additional $3.25M in Whistle-Blower Case Settlement

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Legal & Regulatory Issues

Advertisement

Comments are closed.