The article, coauthored by a researcher at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, was released just after a study in the Annals of Internal Medicine questioned U.S. News and World Report‘s heavy reliance on physicians’ opinions for its rankings.
That Annals study recommended using more objective measures, which often include mortality data because they are easy to compile.
The authors of the new article argued overall mortality rates are a poor measure because only one of every 20 hospital deaths in the United States is preventable.
Rather than use gross mortality statistics, the authors suggested using two other measures to judge hospitals:
- mortality rates associated with high risk procedures heavily dependent on technical skill, such as intrauterine transfusion and heart surgery.
- non-mortality outcomes that are heavily influenced by quality of care, such as rates of hospital acquired bloodstream infection.
Read the British Medical Journal’s report on mortality statistics.
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.
