Commission chair Nancy Schlichting outlined numerous weaknesses inherent to the system, including understaffing a various VA facilities, obsolete IT departments and equipment, flawed operating processes and supply chain weaknesses that threaten the viability of the program, according to the article.
Some members of Congress criticized the commission’s call to privatize part of the VA system, arguing that more veterans would choose private sector care, driving up VA costs and jeopardizing the “unique…health services” offered by VA medical facilities specifically to treat veterans, according to the article.
Ms. Schlichting said the commission had discussed implementing a phased approach to test the commission’s choice model and the potential impact it may have on VA budgets and programs before fully implementing the reforms.
Representative Jeff Miller (R-Fla.) also voiced his concern over the creation of a new oversight committee. One of the commission’s suggestions included establishing a new board of directors who would have the authority to create a long-term strategy for the organization and would ensure that plans be carried out by a VA undersecretary of health.
Ms. Schlichting said the system needs an undersecretary for health to demand adherence to strategic initiatives outlined by the board. Congressional oversight, she said, wasn’t enough, according to the article.
Despite protests, congressional members have been largely receptive to the commission’s reform proposals.
More articles on legal and regulatory issues:
Candy Color Lenses owner found guilty in counterfeit, misbranding scheme
California hospital should let patients haves medical marijuana, physician says
Activists protest California hospital’s birthing delivery technique ban
