6 questions your external peer review policy should address

External Peer Review typically is thought of as the review of a medical record for individual cases in which concerns have been raised regarding the quality or appropriateness of care.

Advertisement

This review can be based on concerns regarding adverse outcomes, the appropriateness of procedures or treatments, or the use of resources.

The implementation of EPR for case reviews should be driven by a clear medical staff policy that has been reviewed by legal counsel. A good EPR policy should address the following six questions:

1. What circumstances typically require EPR?
2. Who determines when EPR is needed?
3. Who will select the reviewer?
4. How will the cases be selected?
5. Who will review the EPR report findings?
6. How will the results be used?

To read more, click here.

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Integration & Physician Issues

Advertisement

Comments are closed.