The state will pay the federal government $16 million in fees for the 2018 open enrollment period and up to $30 million in 2019. State officials are exploring whether acquiring its own technology might be cheaper and also offer them more control.
“The question is whether there is some alternative that would actually be cheaper, or at least competitive in price, that might also give Oregon flexibility,” said Jesse O’Brien, policy director for the Oregon State Public Interest Research Group and a member of the exchange’s Marketplace Advisory Committee, according to the Lexington Herald-Leader.
Oregon is part of a group of states negotiating with CMS to gain greater flexibility and access to data from its exchanges. Nevada, like Oregon, performs much of the work operating its exchange, though it relies on federal software.
Officials from that state are attempting to purchase software from a third-party vendor in time for the 2020 enrollment period. If Nevada is successful, Oregon and other states may follow suit.
More articles on leadership and management:
National survey shows millennial nurses rewriting the rules
Physician groups form new coalition aimed at helping providers transition to value-based care
Sen. McCaskill drafts bill to give states more control over air ambulance costs
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.