Many hospital and health system revenue cycle leaders have pushed back on a consistent fear surrounding artificial intelligence: that it could eliminate jobs.
The common thought process from executives across the country is that AI will reshape how RCM leaders conduct their jobs and not do away with them entirely. However, technology can best deliver on that promise when healthcare organizations use it as an operating model change, not a plug-and-play solution.
The “set it and forget it” misconception
Paul LePage, vice president of revenue cycle for Sacramento, Calif.-based UC Davis Health, told Becker’s that the largest myth in RCM AI is that it functions as a “set it and forget it” solution, with the ability to automatically fix cash flow, denials and underpayments.
“In reality, AI in RCM augments human expertise; it surfaces patterns in denials, prioritizes work queues and automates low-complexity tasks, but it does not replace payer strategy, contract interpretation or escalation judgment,” Mr. LePage said.
Mr. LePage said without ongoing governance, retraining and monitoring, the technology can work against organizations through performance degrades and increased revenue leaks.
Drew von Eschenbach, vice president of enterprise revenue cycle for Seattle-based UW Medicine, echoed Mr. LePage, and told Becker’s that there is no home run “turnkey solution.”
“There is considerable planning, building, testing before executing and a fair amount of maintenance to ensure AI functions as design,” he said. “As well as when it comes to leveraging AI that works as middleware between payer and providers, it becomes a game of pitch and catch. Both sides need to work together to be effective, and we all know that is not always the case.”
Denials don’t start at billing
Other leaders pointed to a certain misunderstanding about where AI should be deployed in the revenue cycle.
Michelle Myers, senior director of revenue cycle management for Boulder Care in Portland, Ore., told Becker’s that many organizations are zeroing in on the wrong end of the problem.
“It is easy to think of denials as a billing issue that begins when a claim is submitted,” she said. “Most denials are set in motion much earlier, often during scheduling, intake or documentation.”
Ms. Myers said this is where AI can commonly be misapplied, with organizations deploying the tool to prioritize accounts receivable or automate appeals, while the main issue remains untouched. She pointed to incomplete eligibility checks, incorrect payer selection, missing prior authorization and unclear medical necessity language as culprits that can “seal a claims fate” before it’s touched by billing.
Instead, the real opportunity is prevention rather than immediate reaction.
“By identifying patterns in payer behavior and feeding those insights back into intake workflows, authorization triggers, and documentation practices, AI becomes a front-end guardrail rather than a back-end rescue tool,” she said. “Denials are not simply billing outcomes. They are system signals, and AI is most powerful when it helps the system correct itself early.”
Broken processes, intensified
One recurring theme amongst revenue cycle leaders was how AI can expose an organization’s operational weaknesses, instead of masking them.
“The biggest myth, by far, is that AI will replace clinicians,” Laura Elliott, vice president of revenue cycle for Brooks Rehabilitation in Jacksonville, Fla., told Becker’s. “While AI can identify patterns, predict risk and prioritize work, it cannot fix broken processes, unclear accountability, poor data integrity or weak payer strategy. AI is at its most powerful when it is paired with governance, cross-functional alignment, [key performance indicator] discipline and leadership accountability.”
Jennifer Armendariz, vice president of revenue cycle and managed care for Madera, Calif.-based Valley Children’s Healthcare, echoed Ms. Elliot.
She said that while AI can offer stronger insight into root causes at an organization, it cannot automatically resolve issues like contract and policy misalignment, payor accountability gaps, poorly designed workflows and weak governance.
“AI could be an incredible catalyst to improve the entire healthcare ecosystem, but only if payers and providers are willing to engage and align incentives to drive efficiency and outcomes across the industry,” Ms. Armenzariz told Becker’s.
Heather Dunn, senior vice president of revenue cycle for Winston-Salem, N.C.-based Novant Health, agreed, and told Becker’s that an organization’s success will be measured by its ability to spearhead accountability, rework decision making and zero in on strong operations.
“Another misconception is that AI replaces humans,” she said. “The future is human-centered intelligence, where AI amplifies judgment, operational excellence and patient experience. Organizations that succeed do not just “implement AI,” they redesign how care is delivered, financed and experienced. When applied thoughtfully, the impact is very real.”
Ms. Dunn said Novant is already seeing strong results in certain areas through utilizing AI, like generating appeal letters for insurance denials and contributing to the recovery of millions of dollars, freeing up employees to focus on higher-value tasks.
Elevate staff, don’t replace them
On the topic of workforce, leaders consistently highlighted how AI can shift the nature of RCM tasks toward higher-judgement ones, rather than cutting roles entirely.
Keisha Downes, vice president of mid-revenue cycle for Cambridge, Mass.-based Beth Israel Lahey Health, told Becker’s that the technology can help increase professional development when thoughtfully executed.
“AI can be used to accelerate expertise development in novice staff by surfacing learning opportunities, flagging gaps in real time and providing a continuous feedback loop that traditional training can’t always deliver at scale,” she said. “A human-centered AI framework is important as it reduces compliance and quality risk but also protects the organizational knowledge and reasoning capability that experienced staff carry.”
However, deploying AI without change management, human oversight and training can result in employees “disengaging from the reasoning process,” which can validate the myth many are working to remove.
The real work is organizational
Across all leadership responses, the consistent message was that organizations will benefit most from AI in the revenue cycle if they invest in the operations around it, not just the technology.
“The biggest myth in healthcare AI is that it’s a plug-and-play solution that delivers instant transformation,” Gloria Glover, vice president of business operations for Harris Health System, told Becker’s. “Meaningful impact depends on data quality, workflow integration and aligning AI to real clinical, operational and financial problems, not replacing human expertise.”
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.